Criminal Justice and Mass Incarceration

Nineteen year old incarcerated at East Carroll Detention Center.

Since our inception in the 1960’s, when our attorneys defended protestors at the Chicago Democratic National Convention, CCR has been at the forefront of criminal justice issues such as mass incarceration, jail expansion, and challenging unjust detentions. In a country that puts more people in jail than any other country in the world, we will continue to fight the mass incarceration of millions in our nation’s prison system, as well as challenge practices such as racial profiling, immigrant detention, and discriminatory laws that lead to a disproportionate number of people of color behind bars.

Get Involved »

Stop Proposed FBI Guidelines Allowing Racial Profiling

Recent news reports have revealed that the FBI is planning to release new Department of Justice…

Spread the Word!

The more people that know, the better. A surprisingly small number of people know about…

Learn More »

Join CCR's 100 Days Campaign!

You Tell Obama What Must Be Done in the first 100 days of his presidency.

This instructional video, produced by Sabrina Gordon of Vespertine Films, demonstrates how you can participate in…

Report: Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook

This Handbook explains how a person in a state prison can start a lawsuit in the…

Our Cases »

Martha Wright v. Corrections Corporation of America (FCC Petition)

This FCC petition requests federal regulation of interstate prison telephone calling systems to ensure just telephone rates and adequate telephone services for prisoners.

Walton v. NYSDOCS

Walton v. NYSDOCS is a class action lawsuit filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) challenging the constitutionality of the State’s monopoly telephone contract with MCI/Verizon, which forced family members and friends of prisoners…

Daniels, et al. v. the City of New York

In 1999, CCR filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to challenge the NYPD’s policy of conducting stop-and-frisks without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity as required by the Fourth Amendment.… Read More >>

Muntaqim v. Coombe (amicus)

Jalil Abdul Muntaqim, an African American serving a life sentence in the custody of the New York, challenged the Section 5-106 under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Read More >>

tagbottom Share This